Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Haag

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 15, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion- to direct a temporary administrator to deliver personal property to the executor subsequently appointed.

1Opinion of the Court

Schulz, S.

The petitioner prays for an order directing a temporary administrator, appointed pending the probate of the last will and testament of the decedent, to deliver the personal property in its possession to the executor of the will. Counsel for the corporation, the temporary administrator, stated that it was willing to deliver the property, but wished to withhold a sufficient sum to cover commissions and expenses incurred and necessarily to be incurred, and claimed the right to have its accounts judicially settled. Upon that settlement it urges that the parties to be cited are the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of StrautNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. In re the Estate of PhelpNew York Surrogate's Court · 1899
  3. In re the Estate of DoetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MassiminoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  2. In re the Estate of DaytonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1917
  3. In re the Estate of BreidnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952
  4. In re the Estate of ReillyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  5. In re the Estate of HermanowskiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API