Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Dayton

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 15, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Petition for judicial settlement of the accounts of a temporary administrator.

1Opinion of the Court

Schulz, S.

Pending a contest of the alleged will of the decedent a temporary administrator was appointed. The decree admitting the will to probate was entered on May 5, 1917. Thereafter, and on May seventh, letters testamentary were issued to the executor named therein, and on June 1, 1917, an appeal was taken by some of the heirs at law and next of kin. This appeal is as yet undetermined. Upon the issuance of letters testamentary the temporary administrator became functus oficio and its power ceased (Matter of Choate, 105 App. Div. 356; People ex rel. Avery v. Purdy, 155 id. 607; affd., 209…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of PhelpNew York Surrogate's Court · 1899
  2. In re Last Will & Testament of HassettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. In re the Estate of DoetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. In re the Estate of HaagNew York Surrogate's Court · 1917
  5. People Ex Rel. Avery v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament & Codicil of KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  2. In re the Estate of HermanowskiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API