Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RESTANI, Judge:
This action challenges the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) final results rendered in the third antidumping (“AD”) duty review of certain wooden bedroom furniture (“WBF”) from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of China,: Final Results of Anti-dumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Reviews, 74 Fed.Reg. 41,374, 41,374 (Dep’t Commerce Aug. 17, 2009) (“Final Results”)-, Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Brock v. Pierce CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Nation Ford Chemical Company v. United States, and Yude Chemical Company, Zhenxing Chemical Industry Company and Pht International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- CS Wind Vietnam Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Maclean-Fogg Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.