Legal Opinion

Nottingham v. McCormick

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1973No. 10717PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFadden, justice.

Plaintiff-respondent Mary Jacquelynne Nottingham instituted this action on her own behalf and on behalf of her minor children to recover damages for the death of her husband, George Eugene Nottingham. In her amended complaint she named as defendants Dr. James E. McCormick and his wife, the appellants herein. She also named as defendants Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth Summers and Carolyn McCormick Hollenberg, who is the daughter of Dr. and Mrs. McCormick.

In her second amended complaint, respondent, Mrs. Nottingham alleged that on the night of August 22, 1967, her husband was driving a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Petricevich v. Salmon River Canal CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Whitt v. JarnaginIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Corthell v. PearsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Soran v. SchoesslerIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Hobbs v. Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mac Tools, Inc. v. GriffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. SeitterIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. JohnsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. SeitterIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API