Legal Opinion

State v. Seitter

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1995No. 21680Published

1Opinion of the Court

900 P.2d 1367 (1995)

127 Idaho 356

STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Charles W. SEITTER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 21680.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, February 1995 Term.

August 18, 1995.

Stanton P. Rines, Jr., Kendrick, for appellant.

Alan G. Lance, Atty. Gen.; Douglas A. Werth, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent. Douglas A. Werth, argued.

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a criminal case involving drugs. The dispositive issue concerns the admission of evidence that we conclude was not relevant. Because we also conclude this error was not harmless, we reverse and remand for a new trial. We also provide…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. PizzutoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. ZimmermanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. RandlesIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API