Legal Opinion

Kanupp v. Land

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 9, 1958No. 310PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

A property owner who has no reasonable access to his property and for that reason is denied the beneficial use thereof may file his petition with the clerk of the Superior Court and, upon a showing of necessity and payment of the damages sustained, have an easement imposed on the land of his neighbor to provide the isolated property owner reasonable access to a public road. G.S. 136-69.

The statute merely accords a right to the property owner who is without reasonable access to the public road. It imposes no duty on him to exercise that right. Compensation for the servitude imposed by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gaither Corporation v. SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Leary v. . Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Current v. . WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Leary v. Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Pritchard v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Taylor v. WEST VIRGINIA PULP & PAPER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Davis v. Forsyth CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API