Legal Opinion

Van Deusen v. Seavey

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2002No. S-9978, S-10057PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Van Deusens sued their neighbors, the Seaveys, to enjoin a private nuisance caused by numerous sled dogs kenneled on the Seav-eys' property. The superior court denied an injunction. Did this denial collaterally estop the Van Deusens' second lawsuit to enjoin the Seaveys? We hold that it does because the Van Deusens have not demonstrated that there was any genuine factual dispute about whether the noise the dogs caused worsened after injunctive relief was denied in the first lawsuit. We therefore affirm the summary judgment against the Van Deusens in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lorraine A. Beatty v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  2. D.J. v. P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Holland v. Union Oil Co. of California, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Thorstenson v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Moody-Herrera v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Lowell v. HayesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. DeNardo v. Calista Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Anderson v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Catalina Yachts v. PierceAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API