Legal Opinion

Vehn v. Bergman

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1953No. 5569PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COORS, Justice.

The controlling question in this case is whether substantial evidence supports the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Ruby E. Vehn.

Mrs. Vehn and Edward P. O’Brien, deceased, were married October 2, 1941, and were divorced April 7, 1944. Under a property settlement entered into between Mr. O’Brien and the plaintiff, O’Brien took title to real estate at 510 N. Eleventh Street in Albuquerque, not involved in this controversy, and plaintiff became vested with title to the property here in question, an apartment building, at 422 N. Eleventh Street, Albuquerque.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. De Baca v. KahnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  2. City of Spokane Falls v. CurryWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Manby v. VoorheesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Union Land & Grazing Co. v. ArceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Southern Union Gas Co. v. CantrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Porter v. PorterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Rasmussen v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Mittag v. Gulf Refining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Juliano v. JulianoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Bradley v. Hap Crawford, General ContractorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API