Legal Opinion

In Re Chamberlin

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 1, 1976No. 215-75PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarrow, J.

Petitioner Chamberlin sought from the Washington County Court a declaratory judgment that his Duxbury junkyard is a pre-existing, non-conforming use under the zoning ordinance of that town. He had been granted a variance by the Duxbury Zoning Board of Adjustment in 1973, but the appellant, his neighbor, appealed this grant to the Washington Superior Court and was awarded a summary judgment.

Interestingly enough, the case below was tried without introducing the Duxbury ordinance into evidence. The finding that it was adopted in March, 1971, is unchallenged, however, and for our purposes we will…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Russell v. PareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Van Sant v. City of EverettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  3. Carroll v. HurstAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Town of Shelburne v. KaelinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  5. Guy v. Town of TempleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API