Legal Opinion
Orenstein v. Star Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 12, 1926No. 2396, 2397PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). There are twenty-four assignments of error to the action of the court below, many of which it is unnecessary to discuss. A careful analysis of the case shows that three major questions are presented for our determination: (1) Was there sufficient evidence of a breach of the condition against increased hazard? (2) Was there sufficient evidence of the breach of condition against false swearing? and (3), if 1 there was a breach of such conditions, were the rights of plaintiff bank under the policies of insurance forfeited thereby?
As to the first question, we…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Syndicate Ins. v. BohnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Delaware Ins. v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Queen Insurance v. Dearborn Savings, Loan & Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Brecht v. Law, Union & Crown Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hargrove v. American Cent. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Central Union Bank of South Carolina v. New York Underwriters' Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. StallardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Transportation Insurance Company, a Foreign Corporation v. Opal M. Hamilton, Doing Business as Opal M. Hamilton FashionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.