Legal Opinion

Matter of Scionti

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1994No. 49S00-9206-DI-444PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

Kevin L. Scionti, the Respondent here, was charged by disciplinary complaint with violating Rule 1.2(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law, pursuant to which an attorney shall not counsel a client to engage in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal. Additionally, the complaint charges Respondent with violating Prof. Cond.R. 8.4(d) by engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.

This Court appointed a Hearing Officer pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 11(e), who, following hearing, tendered his findings of…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of ClaninIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Matter of YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Matter of LevinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1992

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MercerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. In re Hong-Min JunIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Matter of SciontiIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. MercerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API