Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Daggett

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 8, 1993PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, C.J.

The defendant, Dana A. Daggett, was convicted of murder in the first degree by reason of extreme atrocity or cruelty. The principal claim of error the defendant makes is that evidence of tests performed on the victim’s deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and DNA extracted from blood in the trunk of the defendant’s automobile and blood found at the plant where defendant worked was improperly admitted at trial. The defendant contends that the error committed requires a new trial. The author of this opinion and Justice Nolan conclude that the evidence was not properly admitted; a majority of the quorum…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. SiresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. ConnorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. CurninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LaniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. SantiagoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. RosarioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. State v. VandebogartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API