People v. Munoz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Carro, J.
On this appeal, we are presented with a troubling question; whether a reversal is mandated where the Assistant District Attorney who presented the case to the Grand Jury was not admitted to the practice of law, resulting in the presence of an unauthorized person during the Grand Jury proceedings, thereby rendering the indictment defective. The related question of whether defendants’ due process rights were violated where the prosecuting attorney at trial was not admitted to practice is also presented.
*283The People and defendants have stipulated that the Assistant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- BROWN BROS. v. Beam Constr.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. CableNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. FelderNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Munoz v. KeaneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Linares v. SenkowskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. FarrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.