Legal Opinion
State v. Pierson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided August 9, 1991No. 91-446PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
The State has requested summary review of the trial court’s order which granted the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained in a search. The State’s request, filed pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-824 (Reissue 1989), argues that the trial court’s finding that the evidence should be suppressed is clearly erroneous.
On October 17, 1990, members of the Omaha Police Division’s emergency response unit (ERU), which assists in serving search warrants in suspected high-risk situations, entered the backyard of a home at 1906 Military Avenue in Omaha, Nebraska. The ERU team leader, Sgt. Timothy…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. RosalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. ClevelandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. VrtiskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Phillip MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- State v. RamirezNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Commonwealth v. JimenezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- United States v. ApkerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.