Legal Opinion
Natick Auto Sales, Inc. v. Department of Procurement & General Services
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided August 25, 1999No. Nos. 97-P-1444 & 98-P-1874PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
AMI Municipal Vehicles, a division of Natick Motor Sales, Inc. (AMI), is aggrieved by not having been selected as the successful vendor in procurement conducted by the Commonwealth5 in 1996 for a fleet of over 400 State police motor vehicles.6 As to the Commonwealth, the questions that arise on appeal relate to the scope of relief available in a taxpayers’ action under G. L. c. 29, § 63, and the preclusive effect of the taxpayers’ action on a later action. As to the other defendants in the companion case, the questions on appeal have to do with whether their conduct was within the bounds of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Packaging Industries Group, Inc. v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Schwanbeck v. Federal-Mogul Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Stoetzel & Sons, Inc. v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Robinson v. City of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- DiNitto v. Town of PepperellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Carr v. Entercom Boston, LLCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007
- Chokel v. Genzyme Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.