Legal Opinion

Stoetzel & Sons, Inc. v. City of Hastings

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2003No. S-01-1379PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The appellant, Stoetzel & Sons, Inc. (Stoetzel), bid on a contract to construct a service department warehouse for the City of Hastings (City). At an open meeting held on November 13, 1998, the board of public works (Board) accepted the lower bid of a competing contractor. Stoetzel claims it is entitled to injunctive relief because of alleged irregularities in the bidding process. It also claims that the Board violated the public meetings law by failing to make the submitted bids available at the November 13 meeting. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-1412(8) (Cum. Supp. 2002).

The district court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cmm Cable Rep., Inc., D/B/A Creative Media Management, Inc. v. Ocean Coast Properties, Inc., D/B/A Wpor-FmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Bayou Liberty Ass'n v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. Knaust v. City of KingstonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Otey v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Putnam v. FortenberryNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gilroy v. RybergNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Nesbitt Ex Rel. Himself & All Other Similarly Situated Neb. State Penitentiary Segregated Prisoners v. FrakesNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. City of Elkhorn v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Rath v. City of SuttonNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Guerrier v. Mid-Century InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API