Legal Opinion
Hoa Hong Van v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 26, 2007No. 04-56424PublishedCited by 177 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.
I
Hoa Hong Van, a successful claimant for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits, appeals the district court’s denial of her application for attorneys’ fees as time-barred by the filing provision in the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA” or “the Act”), which requires a party to submit a fee application “within thirty days of final judgment in the action,” 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B), and defines “final judgment” as “a judgment that is final and not appealable....” Id. § 2412(d)(2)(G). The district court held that because, following a remand under sentence six of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by177 opinions
- Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jianping Li v. KeislerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- McLeod v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Petty v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.