Legal Opinion

United States v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 29, 1997No. 96-7016PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCÓN, Senior Circuit Judge:

The United States appeals from the district court’s order granting John W. Jones Jr., W.D. Nichols, John T. Lide, and Roy Moore (collectively “the Defendants”) 1 attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (collectively “EAJA fees”). The district court based the award of EAJA fees on its determination that the United States’ claim that the conduct of the defendants violated the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments was not substantially justified. The United States contends that the district court erred in awarding EAJA fees because…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Marie Lucie Jean v. Alan C. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Myers v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Danley v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Rahinah Ibrahim v. US Dept. of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Roseann Michelle Gill v. Grady JuddCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Stanfield v. ApfelDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
  5. Mobley v. ApfelDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2000

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API