Legal Opinion
Smith v. Baldwin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 23, 2006No. 04-35253PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Volume 1 of 2 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROGER PAUL SMITH, No. 04-35253 Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.C. No. CV-98-00059-OMP GEORGE H. BALDWIN, OPINION Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Owen M. Panner, Senior Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted March 9, 2005—Portland, Oregon Filed October 24, 2006 Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Stephen Reinhardt, and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Reinhardt; Dissent by Judge Bybee 17725 SMITH v. BALDWIN 17729 COUNSEL Thomas J. Hester, Office of…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kelly Park v. Karen ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Kelly Park v. Karen ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017