Legal Opinion

Genesco, Inc. v. Scolaro

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 1, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTRELL, Judge.

The primary question on this appeal is whether the Chancery Court of Davidson County was correct in using the Delaware Block method to determine the value of dissenting shareholders’ preferred stock. The appellant also insists that the lower court erred in awarding attorney fees and costs to the dissenter under Tenn.Code Ann. § 48-23-302(b)(2). We affirm.

I

In December of 1987, Genesco, Inc., a Nashville-based shoe and apparel manufacturer, amended its charter to permit the exchange of common shares for its subordinated serial preferred stock. Pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. §…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Blasingame v. American Materials, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Schoen v. J.C. Bradford & Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  4. Warren v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Jacques Coe & Co. v. Minneapolis-Moline Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Athlon Sports Communications, Inc. v. Stephen C. DugganTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Emma Clark v. Randy PerryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  3. Lanny McCormack, individually and as partner of McCormack Farms v. Zollie McCormackCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  4. National Parks Resorts Lodge Corporation v. Antonio PerfettoCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API