Legal Opinion

Spencer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 2008No. ED 90677PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOKER T. SHAW, Judge.

Frederick Spencer (Movant) appeals pro se from the denial of his motion to reopen his post-conviction relief proceedings alleging abandonment by counsel. Movant contends that his post-conviction counsel abandoned him by failing to assert all of his pro se claims. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Movant was convicted by a jury of three counts of forcible sodomy and three counts of forcible rape. He was sentenced to a total of fifteen years and his convictions were affirmed on appeal. State v. Spencer, 50 S.W.Sd 869 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). Thereafter, Movant filed a pro se…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Middleton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Robinson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. LyonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  5. Spencer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spencer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Frederick Spencer v. George LombardiMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State v. SpencerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API