Legal Opinion

Middleton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2006No. WD 65540, WD 65578PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge.

The State and Kenneth Middleton (Middleton) cross-appeal from an order reopening Middleton’s 1991 Rule 29.15 motion and vacating and setting aside Middleton’s convictions and sentences for first-degree murder and armed criminal action and granting him a new trial. The State contends that post-conviction counsel did not abandon Middleton and that the trial court had no jurisdiction to grant him relief under Rule 29.15. We agree and reverse and remand with directions to dismiss Middleton’s motion.

Factual and Procedural Background

In 1991, Middleton was tried…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. StoreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. State Ex Rel. Nixon v. JaynesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Castor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Dudley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Melvin Huffman v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Simmons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Spencer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API