Legal Opinion
Stack v. Lobo
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 15, 1995No. Civ. 95-20049 SWPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE QUICKTURN DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING THE UNDERWRITERS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.
In this securities fraud class action, Plaintiffs allege that Quicktum Design Systems, Inc. and its officers and directors (“the Quickturn Defendants”), in concert with Morgan Stanley, Hambrecht & Quist and two of their analysts (“the Underwriters”), defrauded investors in violation of § 11 and § 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77k & 111, § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Tuchman v. DSC Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In Re Silicon Graphics, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997
- Bains v. MooresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Allison v. Brooktree Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1998
- In Re Immune Response Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005
- Schwartz v. Celestial Seasonings, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.