In re Miller
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, District Judge.
This is a review of a referee’s order relating to a homestead exemption to the bankrupt.
The essential facts disclosed by the certificate of the referee and the documents transmitted therewith are as follows:
The bankrupt, True Miller, is now and has been at all times involved in this matter the husband of Eva Miller. They have together resided upon the real property which is the subject matter of this review since its acquisition by them, and do now continue to reside thereon. The property is described as follows: “Lot 14 of Madison Park as shown on file in Book 14,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- In Re Estate of GurnseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Watson v. PeytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Fitzell v. LeakyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Marelli v. KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Strangman v. DukeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Kachigian v. KachigianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Johnson v. BraunerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- In re EadeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1964
- In re HendricksDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1969