Legal Opinion
Ferreira v. Storms
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 3, 1970PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action to recover for damages sustained by them when an automobile operated by Robert T. Miska, hereinafter called the decedent, struck their house on September 27, 1964. The jury returned a defendants’ verdict. The plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment rendered on the verdict, assigning error in the charge, in the refusal to charge as requested and in certain rulings on evidence.
As to the error claimed in the portion of the charge attacked, no exceptions were taken. Consequently no error may be predicated on this ground. Practice Book § 249; Prystash v. Best…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Casalo v. ClaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Nikitiuk v. PishteySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Oborski v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Prystash v. Best Medium Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Tierney v. American Urban CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Campbell v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.