Legal Opinion
Cornell University v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 26, 2004No. 5:01-cv-1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
MORDUE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this action, 1 plaintiffs Cornell University and Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. (collectively referred to as “plaintiff’) claim that defendant Hewlett-Packard Company has infringed United States Patent 4,807,115 (“115 patent”). Defendant interposed counterclaims asserting that the patent is invalid. United States Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles.issued an order on August 8, 2002, noting that “[i]t is envisioned that the parties will work together toward the preparation for a Mark-man hearing, [pursuant to Markman v.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cargill, Inc. v. Sears Petroleum & Transport Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2004
- Cornell University v. Hewlett-Packard Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2009