Legal Opinion

Cornell University v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided April 24, 2009No. 01-CV-1974PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SECOND AMENDED ORDER

RANDALL R. RADER, Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

This court conducted an eight-day jury trial running May 19-30, 2008 to determine the validity and infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,807,115 (the '115 patent). Finding the '115 patent valid and infringed, the jury awarded damages to Cornell. Hewlett-Packard now moves this court to enter judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) that the '115 is invalid for failure to satisfy the written description requirement, and that Hewlett-Packard did not infringe the patent…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Volterra Semiconductor Corp. v. Primarion, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API