Legal Opinion

Rieffel v. Johnston-Foote

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 10, 2016No. AC37762 AppendixPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs, Bich-Ha Henriette Rieffel and Marc A. Rieffel, appeal from the summary judgment rendered on their complaint in favor of the defendants, Penelope D. Johnston-Foote, Rayh Foote, also known as Ray Foote, Diane Jones, Michael B. Jones, Dan Tredwell, Lucinda Tredwell, Sue Baker, Attorney Daniel W. Moger, Jr., Daniel W. Moger, LLC, the Penelope Johnston-Foote Family Qualified Personal Residence Trust (trust), and LWT Associates, LLC (LLC). 1 In their complaint, the plaintiffs sought damages for vexatious litigation and abuse of process against several of their neighbors individually…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Appleton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  4. DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cadle Co. v. OgalinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. Rieffel v. Johnston-FooteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  3. Rieffel v. Johnston-FooteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API