Legal Opinion
Cadle Co. v. Ogalin
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 25, 2017No. AC38635PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDiPENTIMA, C.J.
*3 The defendant, Frank F. Ogalin, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, The Cadle Company. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) granted the plaintiff's motion to strike his second special defense, (2) granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and (3) awarded postjudgment interest to the plaintiff. We disagree, and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our discussion. On September 25, 2013, the plaintiff commenced the present action via a two count…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gionfriddo v. Gartenhaus CafeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Barasso v. Rear Still Hill Road, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- John H. Kolb & Sons, Inc. v. G & L Excavating, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. DunicanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Singhaviroj v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cadle Co. v. OgalinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Paul Fiano, Sr.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- People's United Bank v. CulverDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Sikorsky Financial Credit Union, Inc. v. PinedaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018