Edwards v. Brisacher
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order of partial distribution. The controversy arises out of a dispute as to whether the distributees (respondents) are entitled to the portion distributed to them under certain clauses of the decedent’s will, or whether they have by reason of certain facts hereinafter set forth forfeited all their interest in the estate except the sum of ten dollars each under another clause of the will.
The decedent distributed her property by will. In the eighth clause of the will she gave a “diamond wedding ring” to Harry Brisacher, and later in the same article she provided that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Estate of DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Estate of DominiciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Tate v. CampTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- Kline v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Estate of HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
3Cited by11 opinions
- Estate of MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Ivancovich v. MeierArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Estate of EasterdayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Nessel v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Estate of LewyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.