Legal Opinion
Kaslow v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 2014PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Read, J.
Petitioner David Kaslow (Kaslow), a member of the Tier 3 CO-20 retirement plan established by Retirement and Social Security Law § 504-a (hereafter, the Tier 3 CO-20 plan), retired from his position as a correction officer with the New York City Department of Correction (DOC) on July 2, 2009. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that Kaslow’s pension is defined in its entirety by Retirement and Social Security Law § 504-a (c) (2). As a result, the New York City Employees’ Retirement System (NYCERS) properly did not consider Kaslow’s previous civilian service…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Superfund Coalition, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ConservationNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Suffolk Regional Off-Track Betting Corp. v. New York State Racing & Wagering BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of Ly v. New York City Employees Retirement Sys.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Matter of Ramirez v. New York City Employees' Retirement Sys.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Lynch v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2017
- Lane v. WhinneryDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Patrick Lynch v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.