Patrick Lynch v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 44 Patrick Lynch, &c. et al., Appellants, v. City of New York, et al., Respondents. Robert S. Smith, for appellants. John Moore, for respondents. FAHEY, J.: The Appellate Division order should be reversed and Supreme Court’s judgment declaring that defendants violated the second subdivision (h) of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 13-218 by excluding police officers in tier 3 of the state retirement -1- -2- No. 44 system from the retirement…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Riley v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. CahillNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Roberts v. Tishman Speyer Properties, L.P.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Samiento v. World Yacht Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.