Legal Opinion
United States v. Jude R. Hayes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 9, 1986No. 84-1276PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Hayes appeals from his conviction for prescribing Schedule II drugs to patients in violation of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (the Act). He contends that the jury was improperly instructed and that the government should not have been allowed to introduce in evidence his office records secured pursuant to search warrants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I
Hayes is a physician and treats patients at his offices in Porterville, Farmersville, and Ivanhoe, California. After receiving information that Hayes was prescribing…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Kenneth Joe Whitten, John Elmer Gaiefsky, Jack Wayne Gish, Richard Lawrence ShimelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. John E. Kenny, Trenton P. Oelberg, and William L. Parker, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- United States v. Juan Castillo, Aka: Luis Hong Rojas, United States of America v. Antonio De La RentaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. Arnold Sherlock and Ronald CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Richard J. Leary, and F.L. Kleinberg & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.