Legal Opinion
Cindy L. Cameron and Lawrence M. Cameron v. James McCauley Seitz, Monroe County Probate Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 21, 1994No. 93-1104, 93-1295PublishedCited by 137 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Cindy Cameron (“Cindy”) and Larry Cameron (“Larry”), wife and husband, sued Cindy’s former boss, defendant James McCauley Seitz, a former Monroe County, Michigan, probate judge, alleging violations of their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and intentional infliction of emotional distress under state law. A jury returned verdicts favorable to the Camerons and awarded compensatory and punitive damages. On appeal, Seitz argues that he is entitled to absolute and qualified immunity from the Camerons’ claims. We hold that Seitz is…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by137 opinions
- Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Johnida W. Barnes v. Byron R. WinchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Frank Barrett v. Nancy I. Harrington, A/K/A Penny HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Matusick v. Erie County Water AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.