Legal Opinion

Downing v. . Dickson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1944PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSohenck, J.

In Powers v. Murray, 185 N. C., 336, at p. 338, 117 S. E., 161, it is written: “If tbe original (instrument) cannot be produced and it becomes necessary to offer secondary evidence of its contents, sucb contents, including of course its legal operation, must be established by tbe testimony of one wbo bas ‘first-band knowledge on tbe subject’; for hearsay based upon statements made by third parties is not deemed sufficient to impart competent and correct information of tbe matter in dispute. Propst v. Mathis, 115 N. C., 527. This ‘firsthand knowledge’ does not necessarily imply testimony of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Powers v. . MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Powers v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Foreclosure of the Property of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API