Powers v. Murray
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAjdams, J.
It is admitted, as we understand, that if Margaret’s conveyance to Balaam of the 10-acre tract was an advancement and Margaret died seized and possessed of the fifteen acres described in the complaint, Balaam bas no interest in the tract last named because be claims an interest in it only as an beir at law of bis brother Hillary. the defendant alleges that be and Hillary and Sam purchased and paid for the land described in the two deeds executed by James Wells and bis wife and that Margaret took the title in ber own name and held it in trust for them and that after Sam’s death she executed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tayloe v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Plummer v. . BaskervilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1840
- Fisher v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849
- Gillis v. Wilmington, Onslow & East Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Jones v. Ballou.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Downing v. . DicksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- McCollum v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950