Legal Opinion

Powers v. . Murray

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 25, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action, brought by plaintiffs in a proceeding for the partition of two tracts of land, containing respectively 15 acres and 3 1/2 acres, and alleged that the defendant had no interest in either tract.

Hillary Murray and Margaret Powers while in slavery lived together as man and wife and afterwards complied with the act of 1866 (C.S. 2497) for the purpose of validating their union. Margaret was the mother of I. M. Powers, Alice, Phyllis, Hillary, Sam, Balaam, and Grace. Alice, Hillary, and Sam died intestate and without issue. Phyllis married David Gavin and four of their children are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Plummer v. . BaskervilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1840
  3. Fisher v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849
  4. Gillis v. Wilmington, Onslow & East Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. Jones v. Ballou.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Downing v. . DicksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. McCollum v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Anderson v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API