Laudico v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Some 18 months after filing his note of issue and statement of readiness, plaintiff moved to amend the amended complaint to increase the ad damnum clause to allege new theories of liability and to add his wife as a party plaintiff together with her cause of action for loss of services. Additionally, plaintiff requested leave to serve an amended bill of particulars.
Since the wife’s cause of action for loss of services was time barred when plaintiff sought to amend, the court properly denied that request. The wife was not a prior…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Rivera v. Berkeley Super Wash, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Gray v. Crouse-Irving Memorial Hospital, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Aversa v. TaubesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Gould v. MaroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Marks v. MorrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Anderson v. CarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Clausell v. UllmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.