Legal Opinion

Clausell v. Ullman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 20, 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dachenhausen, J.), entered May 27, 1987, which granted the plaintiffs motion to amend her complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, and the plaintiffs motion is denied.

Over four years after the commission of the alleged medical malpractice and some two years after the commencement of her lawsuit, the plaintiff moved for an order permitting her to amend her complaint so as to add a claim for loss of services on behalf of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Laudico v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Scharfman v. National Jewish Hospital & Research CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Lucido v. VitoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Hyacinthe v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Kettle v. Sweet Home Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Mathews v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API