Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bensch v. Davidson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 28, 2003No. 25633PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice MOORE:

We are asked to determine whether the trial court made certain errors in this breach of contract action. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondents, residential home builders, and appellants entered into a contract for the construction of a home in the Rose Hill Plantation development. No fixed time was set for the completion of the contract.

From the outset of construction, appellants requested several material changes to both the construction method and the house design. These changes resulted in more expenses and affected the timeline of finishing the house, especially when some of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Keaton Ex Rel. Foster v. GREENVILLE HOSP.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. SC FINANCE CORP. OF ANDERSON v. West Side Finance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. Hoeffner Ex Rel. Estate of Hoeffner v. CitadelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Holy Loch Distributors, Inc. v. HitchcockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. FewCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Atlantic Coast Builders & Contractors, LLC v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Atlantic Coast Builders & Contractors, LLC v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Atlantic Coast Builders & Contractors, LLC v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API