United States v. Donald E. McGann
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant Donald McGann appeals his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines, claiming that he is entitled to a four-level reduction pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2P1.1(b)(3). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3231. Notice of appeal was timely filed. Fed.R.App.P. 4(b). “This court reviews de novo the way in which the district court applies the Guidelines.” United States v. Howard, 894 F.2d 1085, 1087 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm.
On January 13, 1990, while serving time in the federal prison camp at Lompoc, California,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. William George HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Lucio MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. AgudeloDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1991
- United States v. CrosbyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. DelucaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Bruce Loren LatimerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Mark Paul SarnoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Carl HillstromCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Timothy E. StalbaumCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.