Legal Opinion
United States v. Agudelo
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided August 1, 1991No. 89-3060-RVPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VINSON, District Judge.
At sentencing in this case, I raised, sua sponte, the applicability of Sentencing Guideline 2P1.1(b)(3), which provides, in pertinent part:
If the defendant escaped from the non-secure custody of a community corrections center, community treatment center, “halfway house,” or similar facility ... decrease the [base] offense level ... by 4 levels....
§ 2P1.1(b)(3), United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines (emphasis added).
The issue is whether a Federal Prison Camp is a “non-secure custody” facility. The Probation Officer’s presentence report (and, apparently, the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Mark Paul SarnoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Carl HillstromCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Traves v. BrownleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Donald E. McGannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Thomas Lowell ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.