Sprague v. Caldwell Transportation Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentBakes, Justice
A
The majority opinion reverses the Industrial Commission, exercising so-called “free review” of what is supposedly the Commission’s conclusion of law that the chiropractic treatment provided by Dr. Downey after April 10, 1985, was “unreasonable.” Being a conclusion of law, according to the majority opinion, we are not bound by the constitutional prohibition in Art. 5, § 9, of the Idaho Constitution which prohibits this Court from reviewing the factual determinations of the Industrial Commission.5 However, the majority opinion does not acknowledge, much less discuss, the Commission’s Finding…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Higginson v. WestergardIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Curtis v. Shoshone County Sheriff's OfficeIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Hazen v. General StoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Lopez v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Smith v. Idaho State University Federal Credit UnionIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.