Legal Opinion

Daisy Manufacturing Co. v. Paintball Sports, Inc.

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2000No. 25414PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

On this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the district court correctly held that the defendant was not the prevailing party for purposes of an award of attorney fees and costs under Idaho Code § 12-120 where the plaintiffs action had been dismissed with prejudice upon stipulation of the parties.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Prior to March 1997, Paintball Sports, Inc. operated a business in Meridian, Idaho. It purchased supplies for the business on open account from Daisy Manufacturing Company, Inc. In March, Paintball Sports, Inc. sold the assets used in its business,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Gilbert v. City of CaldwellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Chadderdon v. KingIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Chenery v. Agri-Lines Corp.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Eighteen Mile Ranch, LLC v. Nord Excavating & Paving, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Bolger v. LanceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Shore v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Lettunich v. LettunichIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. BECO Construction Co. v. J-U-B Engineers Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API