Legal Opinion

Hawkeye-Security Insurance v. Gilbert

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 1994No. 20213PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

This case presents an unusual factual background for a claim against an automobile insurer for injuries inflicted on a bicyclist by the owner of the insured vehicle. We conclude that the automobile liability insurance coverage does not extend to the incident that resulted in the bicyclist’s injuries.

Hawkeye-Seeurity Insurance Co. (“Hawk-eye”) instituted this declaratory judgment action to determine whether an automobile insurance policy issued by it to Cordon L. Gilbert covers injuries sustained by the bicyclist, Greg Laragan. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kangas v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Holm v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Mitchell v. SiqueirosIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Eichelberger v. WarnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Hisaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Jiffy Cab Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PfielAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Viking Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API