Hawkeye-Security Insurance v. Gilbert
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
This case presents an unusual factual background for a claim against an automobile insurer for injuries inflicted on a bicyclist by the owner of the insured vehicle. We conclude that the automobile liability insurance coverage does not extend to the incident that resulted in the bicyclist’s injuries.
Hawkeye-Seeurity Insurance Co. (“Hawk-eye”) instituted this declaratory judgment action to determine whether an automobile insurance policy issued by it to Cordon L. Gilbert covers injuries sustained by the bicyclist, Greg Laragan. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Kangas v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Holm v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Mitchell v. SiqueirosIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Eichelberger v. WarnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Hisaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Jiffy Cab Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PfielAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Viking Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.