R.K.J. v. S.P.K.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
MUSMANNO, J.:
S.P.K. appeals from the Order denying his Motion for paternity testing and join-der of parties, directing that the child support Order for the minor child, A.Q.K., “remain in full force and effect,” and releasing escrowed payments of child support for A.Q.K. to the minor child’s mother, R.K.J. We affirm.
The pertinent facts of this case are as follows:
The child at issue in this case, A.Q.K., was born on July 26, 2004. At the time of the child’s birth, R.K.J. was legally married to [R.J., Sr.]. R.K.J. and [R.J., Sr.] separated in October of 2003. A divorce complaint was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. AndreasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Brinkley v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- In re B.L.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Korn v. EpsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- K.E.M. v. P.C.S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- M.L. v. J.G.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- A.S.M. v. E.M.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- ADB v. AMK, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County2015
- Hoy, K. v. Wheeler, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Jenkins, E. v. Cunningham, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.