Legal Opinion
Reardon v. Lovely Development, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 3, 2004PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] Lovely Development, Inc. appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Mead, J.) in favor of Arthur Reardon. Lovely Development asserts, inter alia, that the evidence does not support the damages award. We agree and vacate the judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] In December 1998, Arthur Reardon leased commercial real property located at 543 Broadway in Bangor from Lovely Development to be used by him in the operation of a fast-food restaurant to be known as the Taco Shack. Reardon made renovations to the premises with funds borrowed from Lovely…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Maine Energy Recovery Co. v. United Steel Structures, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Eckenrode v. Heritage Management Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- King v. KingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Townsend v. Chute Chemical Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Snow v. VillacciSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lougee Conservancy v. Citimortgage, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Wood v. BellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Degenhardt v. Ewe Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Reardon v. LarkinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Darney Ex Rel. K.D. v. Dragon Products Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.