Legal Opinion

Degenhardt v. Ewe Ltd. Partnership

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 24, 2011PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJabar, J.

[¶ 1] When ejecting a guest from a “lodging house,” the owner of the property-need not comply with the forcible entry and detainer process set forth in 14 M.R.S. §§ 6001-6016 (2010). See 30-A M.R.S. §§ 3887-3838 (2010).1 Invoking this principle, EWE Limited Partnership asks us to conclude that its property qualifies as a “lodging house” within the meaning of sections 3837 and 3838. The District Court (Bangor, Gunther, J.) rejected this argument and found that EWE illegally evicted Douglas J. Degenhardt from the property in violation of 14 M.R.S. § 6014, causing him $590 in actual damages.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. King v. KingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  2. Botka v. SC Noyes & Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  3. Estate of MillerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  4. Hatch v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  5. In re Danielle S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miliano v. MilianoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. Peters v. O'LEARYSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  3. Graham v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  4. Town of Levant v. TaylorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  5. Peters v. O'LEARYSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API