Legal Opinion
Arthur v. Gard
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of Park County.
1Opinion of the CourtRichmond, P. J.
E. F. Arthur, appellant herein, was working the Hill Top Mine as lessee, and on February, 1890, he executed the following paper:
“ Denver, Colo., Feb. 24th, 1890.
“ Mr. J. L. Edmunds, Denver, Colo.
“Dear Sir: You are hereby appointed Superintendent of the Hill Top Mine, in full charge of the practical working thereof, getting out the ore, and hauling it to the cars at Fair-play, under the direction of the assignees of the lease. Your salary will be at the rate of two hundred dollars ($200) per month, commencing March 1st.
“ Yours truly,
“ E. F. Arthur, Lessee.”
By virtue of this appointment,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Union Gold Mining Co. v. Rocky Mountain National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1873
- Klink v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- McQuown v. CavanaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
3Cited by3 opinions
- Atchison Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Silver Mountain Mine Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Koerner v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929