Legal Opinion

McQuown v. Cavanaugh

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Arapahoe County Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Richmond, O.

In this action plaintiff below and appellee here sought to recover, for work and labor performed, a balance due, amounting to $95.37. It appears from the record that the plaintiff was in the employ of George L. McQuown, and that McQuown had agreed to pay him the sum of $3.50 per day; that he worked for McQuown until September 21,' 1881, when McQuown made an assignment, and the appellant, Lowena McQuown, wife of George L. McQuown, purchased at sheriff’s sale the stock, and continued the business in her name, with George L. McQuown as her agent; that plaintiff continued to labor for…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Finerty v. FritzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hunter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Arthur v. GardColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. W. C. Bradbury & Co. v. T. A. Butler & SonColorado Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Arthur v. GardColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. City of Pueblo v. FroneyColorado Court of Appeals · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API